Almeida's Madrid Pride posters: when aesthetics make the political message invisible

The new campaign by the Madrid City Council reopens the debate on the depoliticization of Pride and the role of institutions in its public representation

of june 24, 2026 at 14:31h
IMG 0363
IMG 0363

José Luis Martínez-Almeida has once again placed Madrid Pride in an uncomfortable position with an institutional campaign that replaces LGTBIQ+ people or their demands with traditional objects and symbols generated with artificial intelligence. Beyond the design, the use of AI, or the immediate controversy, what is brought to the table is a fundamental question: what does it mean to represent Pride from a public institution.

The choice of posters featuring terraces, chairs, balconies, or decorative elements with a minimal presence of the rainbow flag has been interpreted by collectives and the opposition as a displacement of the main subject of Pride. That is, the shift from people and their demands to aesthetics; from political narrative to a friendly image.

From this perspective, the criticism is not limited to a visual issue. Organizations like Arcópoli and PSOE representatives in the City Council have pointed out that this type of campaign can contribute to diluting the protest character of June 28, a date that was born as a response to discrimination and has historically centered LGTBIQ+ people.

The debate that opens is whether the institutionalization of Pride has led to a more neutral narrative, where social conflict and the memory of the collective are relegated in favor of a more aseptic celebration, intended by some to fit into an image of a festive and “proudly” local city. In this sense, the controversy is not only about a specific campaign, but about a broader trend: the transformation of Pride into an institutional communication product, where aesthetics can end up occupying the space that previously belonged to political demands, and where it seems that the city of Madrid is being celebrated, rather than the political cause that should prevail.

The City Council defends the initiative as a way to maintain the visibility of Pride in the city, but the underlying discussion remains open: whether a celebration that was born to give visibility to a collective can continue to fulfill its function when 'subtly' it seems to stop being shown in the focus of the message.

Add ElConstitucional.es as a preferred Google source for free.

Stay informed about all the latest breaking news with the best information. Against disinformation, for democracy and social rights.

Activate now
The most read